The notes for this poem were written, not in my usual
notebook, but rather on the backs of two small receipts. As the first of these scraps is labelled ‘1’
and the second ‘3’ I fear that my musings that occupied receipt ‘2’ are now
lost to posterity. Still, I worked with
what I had left and wrote the following poem.
As I have
referenced childlessness and loneliness before it would appear that this poem
is part of a sequence that can be studied to bring out dark fears hidden well
in my psyche, but posted blatantly in my poetry. A continuing concern with family and
isolation might well be able to be illustrated by judicious quotation from the existing
poems. That might well be true, but I
think that I would like to cite evidence and suggest alternative readings
before too many of you start delving into what you might think is my
unconscious.
The title
is a clear indication of how the poem might be read. It is instructive to compare the title, Childfree with the more poignant
‘Childless’. I think that using Childfree as a focus will give a very
different reading to the poem, especially by concentrating on the second word
in the title!
I would
also remind readers that ‘I’ of the poem is not necessarily an exact equivalent
of the ‘I’ of the writer. It is true
that I, the writer, have no children – but I would suggest, for me, that is a
statement of fact rather than a statement of loss.
I will not
deny that this poem is founded on the observation of an actual experience of
mine in which I watched the families around me (and the smokers within those
families) and felt myself distanced from what was going on – but the self-pity
that is suggested in the two lines towards the end of the poem,
I’m the only one alone,
and nobody’s concern
was
not the overriding emotion of the moment, though it does seem to play a crucial
role in this particular poem.
And why
shouldn’t poems have a life that is a development beyond the limitations of
their production!
Childfree
A paean to The Family!
This outdoor café’s noise
is proof of that fecundity
where laughing progeny
preserve in youth and age
the borders (firm and
mutually covert)
that keep the years
together quite apart.
The smoke of adult cigarettes
held, finger crooked, is
pose with built-in elegance and
keeps the filth away from kids
but not from me, for
I’m the
only one alone,
and nobody’s concern.
But pen-scrawled fragments
draw all in as part of my own
silent tête-à-tête.
I think the ending with the three lines separated makes an
effective picture of the writer as voyeur/puppet-master, with the words on the
page being the augmented reality created by the poet. Or it could be read as complete
self-deception, the social ‘saving lie’ of someone living through words and not
through life as it is really lived.
I think
that I can live with the ambiguity!
No comments:
Post a Comment